POTENTIAL EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS OF INCORPORATING STRUCTURED CONTROVERSY IN EFL CONTEXT AND ITS POSSIBLE CHALLENGES



Mufanti, Restu (2015) POTENTIAL EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS OF INCORPORATING STRUCTURED CONTROVERSY IN EFL CONTEXT AND ITS POSSIBLE CHALLENGES. Jurnal Cendekia, 13 (2). pp. 275-291. ISSN 1693-1505

[thumbnail of POTENTIAL_EDUCATIONAL_BENEFITS_OF_INCORP.pdf] Text
POTENTIAL_EDUCATIONAL_BENEFITS_OF_INCORP.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB)
Official URL: http://jurnal.stainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/cendek...

Abstract

This paper attempts to explore potential educational benefits and challenges of
implementing structured controversy in EFL learning at university level. Structured
controversy is a model of cooperative learning that occupy intellectual conflict to
facilitate students broaden and deepen understanding related to particular issue/ topic. It is
asserted that providing students with opportunities to engage in structured controversy
activities enables them to have their own ideas and conclusions challenged by advocates
of an opposing position. Students are better able to develop a strong argument in defining
and interpreting issues, developing and evaluating solutions, developing a plan based on a
selected solution, and reflecting on the learning outcomes. Thus, at least threefold
benefits are gained through the process of structured controversy: (a) giving students a
chance to work collaboratively in free risk situation, (b) providing negotiation of meaning
and peer assistance, and (c) shaping college students’ high order thinking. As the
application of structured controversy brings benefits much in learning and provides
support both theories and empirical studies, teachers are suggested to incorporate it in
their teaching especially in EFL context.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PR English literature
Divisions: Research
Depositing User: Library Umpo
Date Deposited: 02 Jul 2016 03:35
Last Modified: 02 Jul 2016 03:35
URI: https://eprints.umpo.ac.id/id/eprint/2014

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item